Related topics

Etiquette questions?
Esperanto's impressive success as the language of international communication is due to three basic advantages. It is easy to learn. It is politically neutral. And it has many practical uses. Esperanto is easy... Esperanto is much easier to learn than any other language. In fact, it can be learned in a quarter of

Named code blockes
The other level consists of very important changes that are not usually found in patches. First and foremost, the English-language version will, The amount of text in that version was reduced compared to other language versions and that was said to cause a significant decrease in immersion and atmosphere.

Multi-language support
And, don't overlook the DIBOL features you take for granted, like the built-in understanding and support of RMS records/files and the convenience of the Message Manager, that you'll need to "bolt-on" to most other languages. We had a customer who used TSX+ and DBL. We also had one on RSTS (I think) in which we had

Advantages and disadvantages of PHP?
Currently, I'm using Java as my default programming language, but there are situations in which I have recently used other languages: 1. Group standards - for example, the group I'm in writes hardware designs in Verilog. Even if someone had hardware synthesis from Java, I couldn't choose to use it, because I have

Application of Various Programming Languages?
Trying to find the meanings of root-words in other language families is much more complicated, and is often purely speculative. The links made between the imagined root-word meanings and expanded words are often very tortuous and questionable as to their logicity. That is because, unlike semitic languages,

Article of interest: Python pros/cons for the enterprise
Well, DBL (Synergy/DE) is, IMO anyway. Actual DIBOL was nice and quite easy to learn and code, but other languages were gaining capabilities that DIBOL didn't have. Synergy/DE, on the other hand, has some really great features that are not "built-in" to most other languages.

FORTH levels
Some routines that are mostly algorithmical may be translated to Pascal or other language with little effort. In fact it isn't so much of a loss to have to rewrite the code - as a very important part of the program can still be re-used: it analysis. Much of the labour we put into improving our Clipper programs

Printing other language?
There is no language that magically corrects for the inherently fallible nature of programming. C certainly does much less than most other languages in this regard, but this is not a secret. No special club membership is required to know this. When a programmer makes the choice to use C instead of some other

I think I'ma mirror
Maybe it's pretentious to use phrases from a language one isn't fluent in, but -- oh well, when I was much younger, at least I sort of tried to learn some languages other than English, and a few words and phrases stuck. Well sort of, except that the word "auf" does not exist in the English language and the proper

Indentation and optional delimiters
It won't print any other language neither, it only print English. I tried many stuff, Installing Global IME from Microsoft, which make it possible to view Japanese and type Japanese on the web and word2000. However, I cannot print them. I called Compaq about this and asked what I can do or if they have something to

Compulsory Maori
But then you continued attacking the use of other languages in this group. I'm not sure I've done that at all. You certainly came across as doing that. is English language only, and that no other language should be used. Yes, that's right. I see no attack there. However, you've still not answered my question:

FORTH levels
So it would actually be surprising if Forth (or Lisp, or Icon, or Modula-2, or Oberon, or any other language) was more popular; yes, it is surprising But look at the base capabilities provided by both core and optional words, and you get a language that provides very little relative to other modern languages.

Learning Forth?
I've spent the rest of the thread trying to show you that they were very much intended to overlay each other, that this was to be assumed in the spec precisely because of its purpose, such purpose having ample precedent already in other languages. You've spent the rest of it claiming I'm wrong and continuing to

SL in other Languages
In this matter, everything is influencing the results: language, filters, number of keywords..... Second, the poor URL composition of the threads you found leaded you to believe there is a specific Google group named "Is something broken". Sorry, no. "Is something broken" is just a sub-discussion of a Help Group

What age is the best time for learning other languages?
I'd like to hear about other example languages to support the "cross-linguistically". Here's a random few: ... All illustrate the general tendency that, if any form is unmarked, 3Sg will be. But ekkilu claimed the opposite. Joachim- I did not claim it. It's a fact for English: 3Sg is more complicated than other

NAM MYOHO RENGE KYO in Other Languages?
Robert Scoble -- MVP -- VBITS rsco...@fawcette.com microsoft public internet netmeeting Peter, When you say you can't "read other language" does that mean that you don't see it displayed in the proper font? Have you tried the Format Menu/Encoding command? Did you load the proper font for the language you are trying

FORTH levels
I have appreciated that article, and I have personally seen how fast students learn Python basics compared to other languages, but I think that it's way more than just indentation that makes the Python language so quick to learn [see appendix]. I used to like indentation-based block delimiting years before finding

Linux programming, is there any C++?
Bill Godfrey billg-use...@bacchae.f9.co.uk.invalid comp programming "Rog" <ir...@mail.com> writes: However, I have noticed a particular de-bugging ability in VB which I have not had in any other language I have used (at least at a high level, lets exclude assembly level). A little nit. What you are describing is a

unable to spell check with other language
I was wondering if anyone knows anything about using code written in other languages within Prolog? I'd like to use C's ncurses library to do some screen IO, colours, that sort of thing, with Prolog as my main programming language. Is that possible, or are there Prolog interpreters/compilers that have that sort of

languages other than English:Charles X.Durand
And, don't overlook the DIBOL features you take for granted, like the built-in understanding and support of RMS records/files and the convenience of the Message Manager, that you'll need to "bolt-on" to most other languages. Like HVW said, too, DBL can move to non-VMS platforms easier than most languages.